<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Davis Faculty Association &#187; 2001</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ucdfa.org/2001/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ucdfa.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Update, August 2001</title>
		<link>http://ucdfa.org/2001/08/legislative-update-august-2001/</link>
		<comments>http://ucdfa.org/2001/08/legislative-update-august-2001/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucdfa.org/wp/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charles Nash To date, the active lobbying efforts of CUCFA have been devoted almost entirely to faculty salary matters. The &#8220;original&#8221; State Budget for UC, which the Governor submitted in January, as well as the budget proposed by the Regents in November, underestimated the increase that would be needed to maintain UC faculty salaries [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ucdfa.org/2001/08/legislative-update-august-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFA Board Responds to SCPPR Report</title>
		<link>http://ucdfa.org/2001/06/dfa-board-responds-to-scppr-report/</link>
		<comments>http://ucdfa.org/2001/06/dfa-board-responds-to-scppr-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2001 03:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucdfa.org/wp/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ben McCoy Faculty Colleagues: The Davis Faculty Association has maintained a deep interest in the faculty personnel review process since we learned of and reported the shocking statistics that UC Davis faculty were seriously behind other UC campuses in salary and rank. In the first DFA Email Bulletin (http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~dfamhays/) issued by the DFA Board [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ucdfa.org/2001/06/dfa-board-responds-to-scppr-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2001 03:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucdfa.org/wp/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Peter Rodman A few weeks ago, Dateline ran an article on a small committee formed spontaneously to discuss issues of smoking on the Davis campus. I initiated the discussion because, like all UC campuses, UC Davis has a “Free” policy (See PPM Section 290-10), but despite this, cigarette smoke regularly enters Smoke through the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COLA Offset, Act II</title>
		<link>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/cola-offset-act-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/cola-offset-act-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2001 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucdfa.org/wp/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charles P. Nash Readers of this newsletter may recall that in 1994-95 the University instituted a three-month offset of the payment of faculty and staff cost of living increases (COLAs) from the July 1st beginning of the State’s fiscal year. As we documented in an earlier article, the effect of this offset is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/cola-offset-act-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UC Budget Update</title>
		<link>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/uc-budget-update-3/</link>
		<comments>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/uc-budget-update-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2001 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ucdfa.org/wp/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charles Nash and Myrna Hays On May 14, reacting to a $5.7 billion deterioration in the state’s fiscal condition, the Governor proposed reducing the University’s General Fund augmentation for 2001-2002 from an original (January) figure of $202.5M to $185.8M. Some of the changes are discussed below. Proposed increases beyond the original appropriations included: · [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ucdfa.org/2001/05/uc-budget-update-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

