To date, the active lobbying efforts of CUCFA have been
devoted almost entirely to faculty salary matters. The
"original" State Budget for UC, which the Governor
submitted in January, as well as the budget proposed by the
Regents in November, underestimated the increase that would be
needed to maintain UC faculty salaries at parity in fiscal year
2001-2002 according to the customary CPEC methodology.
Consequently, the Governor's budget proposed a net 3 % salary
increase for faculty under the umbrella of UC's
"compact" with the Governor. UC and CUCFA hoped that
the May Revise would provide an additional 0.9% (or ca. $7
million) augmentation to bring faculty salaries to parity.
CUCFA representatives sitting side by side with UC Vice President
Hershman formally testified in favor of the above funding before
Legislative committees at every available opportunity. In
addition, Jim Bruner and Joanne Bettencourt from our lobbying
firm of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, LLP, met individually
with key legislators. At one point they had even convinced a
legislator to put in a "member's request" to try to
capture the "additional" 0.9%.
As you of course now know, because of energy costs and other
drains on the State treasury, all of this was to no avail. UC's
gross funding augmentation under the "compact" was
essentially cut in half, and faculty and staff merits and
promotions will consume virtually all the remaining monies in
that particular budgetary pocket. UCOP has yet to announce the
size of the COLA for 2001-2002--or if there will even be one.
Along with the budget CUCFA has been tracking several bills of
particular interest to the UC faculty. Two of them, AB 1063
(Aroner) and AB 1611 (Keeley) deal with possible means for
assisting the construction of student, faculty and staff housing
near UC and CSU campuses. Of the two bills, AB 1611 is making the
best progress toward passage. AB 1063 has evidently stalled in an
Assembly committee, but AB 1611 has passed the Assembly and was
up for hearing in the Senate Housing and Community Development
Committee on August 20.
In brief, AB 1611 would create a California Educational
Facilities Authority that could enter into agreements with
nonprofit entities to finance the costs of construction of the
housing types in question. UC supports both of these bills in
concept, but has asked Member Keeley to amend his bill to include
a Higher Education-Related Housing Loan Program proposed by a UC
Housing Task Force. UC's governmental relations staff report that
so far Mr. Keely has shown no interest in doing so.
CUCFA has formally supported SB 1061 (Alarcon). This bill would
require the Regents to submit annual reports to the Public
Employee Relations Board by March 1 on specified activities
relating to the obligations of the University under the Higher
Education Employer-Employee Relations Act. PERB would in turn be
required to submit reports to the Legislature by September 1 on
the status of specified labor relations at UC. The bill is
supported by essentially all UC's employee organizations but
opposed by CPEC (turf warfare). The University has taken no
public position on the bill but there can be no doubt that they
would be very happy to see it quietly vanish into the night. SB
1061 was passed by the Senate on June 6, passed out of the
Assembly Higher Education Committee, and is now in the Assembly
Appropriations Committee
Home | Current Activities | Newsletters | Join
| Contact | Links
All contents copyright 2001 The Davis Faculty
Association.